Volkswagen Can't Bear a Profit Margin Cut to 1%! Thousands of Workers Protest: We Won't Accept It

09/22 2026 387

Produced by: #MarketCap Finance

Volkswagen Group has once again raised the alarm with a profit warning. Last Friday, the company drastically reduced its 2026 profit forecast, expecting the operating profit margin to plummet from the previous range of 4% to 5.5% to no more than 1%. Simultaneously, it announced approximately €10 billion in asset impairments. Following this announcement, over 280 worker protest events are set to take place across Germany on September 22, with thousands of automotive industry workers taking to the streets. This has pushed the operational challenges of the century-old automaker into an even more intricate labor-management dynamic.

Profit Margin Cut to 1% and €10 Billion in Impairments

The severity of Volkswagen's profit forecast downgrade cannot be overstated. According to official statements, the upper limit of the 2026 operating profit margin has been slashed to 1%, a stark contrast to the previous low end of 4%. The company also confirmed approximately €10 billion in asset impairments, with €6 billion directly linked to the sports car manufacturer Porsche. This indicates that Volkswagen is paying a steep price for the revaluation of its core luxury assets.

Volkswagen CEO Arno Antlitz publicly stated after the warning that market changes are profound and enduring, leaving no time for delay. This underscores the multiple pressures Volkswagen currently faces. The company explicitly attributed the profit forecast downgrade to three primary factors: deteriorating market conditions in China, escalating restructuring costs, and impairments related to Porsche. As a longstanding profit source for Volkswagen, shifts in the Chinese market directly affect the group's overall profitability. Meanwhile, rising restructuring costs reflect the ongoing pressure Volkswagen encounters in its electrification transformation and internal adjustments.

Over 280 Protests Erupt on the Same Day

Following the profit warning, labor-management tensions in Germany's automotive industry quickly intensified. On September 22, over 280 worker protest events will be held simultaneously across Germany, involving thousands of employees from Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, Porsche, and major suppliers. The German Metalworkers' Union (IG Metall) is spearheading this nationwide protest.

Thorsten Gröger, head of IG Metall in Lower Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt, stated before the protests that workers will not stand by as key industries are gradually hollowed out. He emphasized that recent failures were not caused by workers and should not be borne by them. This statement shifts the blame toward corporate decision-makers and the external business environment, rather than the workers themselves.

The union has made clear demands: it requires companies to safeguard factories and jobs while urging Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government to reduce energy costs and shield domestic production from the impact of low-priced imports. It is evident that this protest is not solely directed at Volkswagen but represents a concentrated effort by the German automotive workers' union amid an industry-wide contraction. The broad range of brands involved in the protests—Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, Porsche, and major suppliers—reinforces this point, indicating that the challenges faced by the German automotive industry are not confined to a single company.

Industry Layoff Data Reveals Deeper Contraction

Data released by the German Association of the Automotive Industry provides a comprehensive view of the industry's contraction. Since 2019, the German automotive industry has laid off approximately 100,000 workers, with more layoffs anticipated. Volkswagen alone has internally announced plans that could ultimately affect around 100,000 positions globally. BMW plans to lay off about 8,000 workers, while Mercedes-Benz is reducing production in Germany and expanding low-cost operations in Hungary.

Component suppliers have also been affected. Between 2019 and 2025, German automotive component suppliers have cumulatively cut approximately 74,000 jobs, accounting for nearly a quarter of their total workforce. These figures suggest that from vehicle manufacturers to upstream supply chains, the employment base of the German automotive industry is undergoing a systemic contraction. In this context, Volkswagen's decision to slash its operating profit margin forecast to 1% is not merely an isolated corporate fluctuation but represents a concentrated outbreak of contradictions between the industry's overall profitability and cost structure.

Rising Market Share of Chinese Automakers and Tariff Impacts

External competition and changes in the trade environment also significantly contribute to Volkswagen's warning. Data indicates that Chinese automakers' market share in Europe continues to grow, reaching 11% in July. For German domestic manufacturers like Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW, this means they are facing direct pressure from Chinese brands in their traditionally strong European market.

At the same time, energy costs are also on the rise. The Middle East conflict has driven German gasoline and diesel prices to record highs this month, adding extra pressure to German automakers who rely on domestic production and stable supply chains. In the U.S. market, German automakers lacking local production face an even more precarious situation, especially Porsche and Audi, which are under greater strain due to tariff policies. The €6 billion impairment related to Porsche that Volkswagen booked aligns with this external pressure.

Union Pressure and Policy Demands Coexist

While organizing the protests, the German Metalworkers' Union has directed a significant portion of its criticism toward the government. The union explicitly urged the Merz government to reduce energy costs and protect domestic production from the impact of low-priced imports. This demand is based on the fact that, under the dual pressures of high energy prices and intensified import competition, the survival space for Germany's domestic production system is shrinking.

From Volkswagen's actions, there is no indication that the company will retract its profit warning or adjust its impairment plans. CEO Antlitz's statements focus more on the urgency of responding to market changes rather than addressing the union's demands. This disparity in positions between the company and the union makes the nationwide protest on September 22 a critical juncture for observing the future direction of labor-management relations in Germany's automotive industry. The participation of thousands of workers in the demonstrations indicates that, against the backdrop of declining profit margins and emerging layoff plans, the labor-management dynamic has entered an open stage.

The challenges Volkswagen faces stem from both internal costs arising from its business structure and restructuring process, as well as external shocks such as changes in the competitive landscape in the Chinese market, tightening trade policies in Europe and the U.S., and high energy prices. Warning signals extend from the profit margin cut to 1% and €10 billion in impairments to simultaneous protests by thousands of workers across the country. The disclosure by the German Association of the Automotive Industry of layoffs on the scale of 100,000 points to an even longer-term structural adjustment process. How the ultimate costs of this adjustment will be shared among companies, workers, and the government remains to be seen.

END

Disclaimer

MarketCap Finance hereby states that all information and content provided are based on objectively compiled and analyzed publicly available data. However, we cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. Any opinions, analyses, or conclusions contained herein are the independent views of MarketCap Finance at a specific point in time and do not represent any investment advice or strategy. Financial markets involve risks, and investors should bear full responsibility for any decisions made based on this information. If you have any questions about our content or discover any omissions, please contact us directly through our official backend channels, and we will verify and address them promptly.

Solemnly declare: the copyright of this article belongs to the original author. The reprinted article is only for the purpose of spreading more information. If the author's information is marked incorrectly, please contact us immediately to modify or delete it. Thank you.