Today, let's continue to address questions from our followers. Recently, one follower inquired whether the understanding within the VLA model is also guided by predefined rules to direct actions. This query indeed merits discussion. Today, Intelligent Driving Frontier will guide you through a comprehensive exploration.

What is a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Model?

Before delving into today's topic, let's first clarify what a VLA model entails. The Vision-Language-Action Model (VLA) is a recent innovation in the fields of robotics and artificial intelligence. Its objective is to enable machines to 'perceive the world,' 'comprehend task instructions,' and subsequently execute actions autonomously.

Consider a scenario where a robot faces a table cluttered with toys. You instruct it verbally, "Place the red ball into the box." The robot must first 'observe' the objects on the table, distinguish the red ball and the box, comprehend the meaning of your command, and finally, manipulate its robotic arm to pick up the ball and place it in the designated location. The significance of the VLA model lies in its ability to integrate these three tasks seamlessly, rather than performing them sequentially as in traditional systems.

A typical VLA model comprises two core components: a Vision-Language Encoder, which maps image and language inputs into internal representations for machine processing, and an Action Decoder, which generates specific action commands based on these representations. This architecture enables the combination of visual information and language instructions in a single computational step, directly outputting mechanical actions or control signals.

The rationale behind proposing the VLA model is that traditional robotic systems segregate visual perception, language understanding, and action planning into distinct modules. Such modular systems struggle to collaborate effectively in complex environments and exhibit poor adaptability to scene variations. The end-to-end approach of the VLA model aims to integrate perception, understanding, and action into a unified whole, thereby possessing more natural and human-like operational capabilities.

What Exactly Constitutes 'Understanding' in a VLA Model?

When many people hear that AI possesses 'understanding capabilities,' they often associate it with rule-based judgments, such as "if a red ball is detected, execute a grasping action," found in traditional programs. While this rule-based thinking provides a foundation for actions, the understanding in a VLA model does not rely on explicit, predefined programming rules to guide each action. Instead, its understanding stems from associative patterns learned through extensive examples.

In essence, the 'understanding' in a VLA model is not a pre-written instruction set but an internal capability acquired through end-to-end learning. During the training phase, the model is exposed to large-scale training data composed of triplets from numerous real or simulated scenarios: visual input, natural language instruction, and corresponding action trajectory. For instance, the data might include records like, "the image depicts a desktop scene, the language instruction is to place the cup into the box, and the action sequence involves the robotic arm moving and completing the grasping action." The model gradually learns the statistical relationships between visual features, language representations, and action outputs by repeatedly processing such samples.

This learning process is statistical rather than logic-based. The model does not possess an explicit code dictating "red means to grasp"; it merely observes from the data that executing certain actions is appropriate in scenarios involving "red ball" and related instructions.

From this perspective, 'understanding' in a VLA model resembles statistical inference. The model does not evaluate whether an explicit rule is satisfied but makes predictions based on the multimodal associations it has learned. When processing language components, it operates similarly to human language models; when interpreting visual information, it employs a visual encoder to extract scene features; and the output of actions is a probabilistic strategy formed during learning. This capability results from the collaboration of various network layer structures and training methods, rather than being determined by a rule engine within a single module.

How Does 'Understanding' Occur Inside a VLA Model?

To elucidate how 'understanding' occurs within a VLA model, let's dissect the model into several components for clarity.

In the visual module, a computer vision network transforms the images captured by the camera into a set of high-dimensional features. These features describe information such as the position, color, and shape of objects in the scene. This transformation is not achieved through predefined rules but is learned through a visual encoder (e.g., a Transformer or certain deep learning architectures). These visual encoders convert pixels into more abstract, task-relevant representations, which constitute a visual understanding capability acquired from data.

The language module resembles contemporary large language models. It converts natural language instructions into semantic vectors that can be processed internally by the machine. The language module does not dissect instructions into explicit steps but maps language into a semantic space representation where task goals, action intentions, and other information can be further processed. This language encoding capability is also learned from a vast amount of text and instruction data.

After the encoding results of both vision and language are converted into internal representations, a fusion layer or a common latent space representation within the model merges the representations of the two different modalities. This enables visual information and language goals to be combined into a comprehensive representation. In this layer, the model learns which objects in the visual scene are associated with the semantic instructions. Taking the earlier example of the robot picking up the red ball for simplicity, if the language mentions "red ball" and there is a high-dimensional vector related to red objects in the features of the visual encoder, the model will associate them.

The fused internal representation is then passed to the action decoder, which converts the comprehensive expression into specific action commands. The output of the action decoder can be control signals for robot joints, path planning parameters, etc. During training, the model has already processed numerous input-output pairs, enabling it to learn how to output the correct actions given visual and language conditions. This output is not determined by predefined rules but is the optimal action prediction obtained through the internal network structure and weight calculations of the model.

The entire process described above may appear as a black box, where the input is an image and a sentence, and the output is a set of action commands. Numerous matrix multiplications and nonlinear transformations occur in between, all of which are mapping relationships learned through statistical learning.

Final Words

Returning to the initial question, is the understanding in a VLA model based on predefined rules to direct actions?

The answer is no. The VLA model does not rely on pre-written rules in the traditional sense. Its understanding and action generation capabilities stem from the learning process of numerous vision-language-action examples. After learning, the model can generate reasonable action outputs through internal latent space representations and mapping relationships when presented with new images and language instructions. This capability resembles pattern matching and strategy generation capabilities trained through data, rather than relying on a pre-written set of rules.

This design endows the VLA model with stronger generalization capabilities and adaptability. However, it also means that it is not as easily explainable or explicitly verifiable as rule-driven systems. This 'learned understanding' is a statistical form of capability. Such models are anticipated to perform increasingly like the 'intelligent agents' we envision in more complex tasks.

-- END --