Throughout the development of autonomous driving, data annotation has long been regarded as the cornerstone of algorithmic evolution. However, with the advent of the large model era, this field is undergoing significant reconstruction.

In the past, annotators' tasks were simply to draw boxes on 2D photos, marking the positions of vehicles and pedestrians. But now, to support complex end-to-end architectures and occupancy networks, annotation work has evolved from flat pixel-level marking to deep reconstruction in 4D spatiotemporal space.

Challenges of Spatial Stereoscopy and Temporal Continuity

The difficulty in autonomous driving annotation lies in the transition from 2D images to 3D vector space. Early algorithms only needed to recognize pixels in images, whereas modern systems must understand an object's precise coordinates, dimensions, and orientation in the physical world under a unified bird's-eye view.

This perceptual capability, known as vector space perception, requires annotation tools to align images from multiple cameras around the vehicle, as well as potential LiDAR point clouds, with millimeter-level precision within a unified 3D coordinate system.

Even a tiny error in the calibration parameters between sensors can result in severe object ghosting or positional drift when mapped into 3D space.

This demand for stereoscopy has further evolved into 4D spatiotemporal annotation. Simply knowing an object's position in 3D space is insufficient; the system must understand how these objects change over time, adding the fourth dimension—time.

When processing dynamic objects, the annotation system must ensure that the same object has a unique identifier across hundreds of consecutive frames. This temporally consistent annotation is crucial for predicting the behavior of others.

For example, the system needs to determine, based on the past few seconds of trajectory, whether a pedestrian on the roadside is preparing to cross the street or merely walking alongside it.

This precise capture of motion characteristics requires the annotation process to handle data clips lasting tens of seconds or even minutes, rather than isolated single-frame images.

To achieve this high-dimensional reconstruction, the industry has adopted a method known as "retroactive annotation."

In a driving segment, a single frame may not provide complete information due to occlusion or distance. However, as the vehicle approaches or the obstruction moves, future frames reveal the object's true physical properties.

Automated annotation systems leverage this ability to "annotate the past with knowledge of the future," using offline large neural networks to smooth and correct historical trajectories, thereby generating extremely high-precision ground truth data.

While this logic theoretically solves the occlusion problem, in practical engineering, handling exposure differences between multiple cameras, shutter delays, and image blur caused by high-speed motion remains an extremely challenging technical issue.

This shift from "viewing photos" to "understanding the world" has directly led to an explosion in the volume of data annotation.

In the past, annotating a thousand photos might have taken only a few days, but in the era of large models, annotating a complex 3D urban intersection scene may require hours of computational power and professional manual review.

Given the high demands for diversity and accuracy in large models, any subtle annotation noise can be amplified during training, causing the vehicle to exhibit inexplicable braking or steering in certain scenarios.

Engineering Challenges in Automated Annotation Pipelines

Faced with massive amounts of road test data, relying solely on manual annotation is no longer feasible. Automated annotation pipelines have become standard in the era of large models.

The "shadow fleet" model promoted by leading companies like Tesla fundamentally relies on using cloud-based ultra-large-parameter models to annotate raw data collected by vehicles.

The essence of this automatic annotation engine is to leverage the asymmetric advantages of offline models in terms of computational power and information volume.

Since cloud models do not need to consider real-time performance, they can repeatedly process the same segment and even incorporate data from other vehicles that have historically traveled the same route for joint optimization.

This "big teaching small" approach enables vehicle-mounted models to learn details that even human annotators would struggle to discern with the naked eye.

However, building automated pipelines requires addressing numerous issues.

First, static background reconstruction is necessary. To generate precise road surface ground truth, the system must use technologies like neural radiance fields to "synthesize" the road surface.

But on real roads, the environment is constantly changing. Trees sway, vehicles move around—if these dynamic factors are not perfectly removed from the background, the generated road surface model will be filled with noise.

This high demand for "separating static from dynamic" requires algorithms to accurately understand the structure of the physical world, distinguishing between permanently existing road edges and temporarily parked trash cans.

Another challenge lies in handling irregular obstacles. Traditional annotation primarily targets objects with fixed shapes, such as vehicles and pedestrians, but in the era of large models, the system must perceive all objects occupying space.

Objects like wooden crates fallen on the road, tilted utility poles, or oddly shaped construction vehicles fall into this category.

These objects lack standard size models for reference. Annotation systems can use "occupancy network" technology to divide space into countless tiny grids and label the occupancy status of each grid.

This annotation method increases storage and computational requirements exponentially.

To reduce complexity, some techniques introduce mathematical tricks like signed distance fields to describe object surfaces, but this introduces complex mathematical fitting problems, making it extremely difficult to balance annotation precision and computational efficiency.

In this automated system, the role of humans has fundamentally changed. Humans are no longer direct "box drawers" but "rule setters" and "anomaly reviewers."

Whenever the model generates incorrect labels, humans must analyze whether it was due to poor lighting, rain obstruction, or sensor calibration failure.

This in-depth analysis of anomalies requires annotators to possess extremely high technical literacy.

Additionally, to continuously optimize the automated pipeline, the system must construct a feedback loop. Whenever humans correct an error, this corrected high-precision data is fed back into the automated model to improve its annotation accuracy next time.

This self-evolving annotation loop is key to enabling autonomous driving systems to continually push performance limits.

Addressing Perception Bottlenecks in Occlusion and Extreme Environments

In real-world autonomous driving scenarios, the environment is never perfect. Occlusion is widely recognized as a "killer" for perception systems.

When a large truck blocks the view ahead, the system must not only recognize the truck but also predict whether pedestrians might suddenly cross from behind it.

Annotating these "invisible" data is extremely difficult.

In the annotation process of the large model era, the concept of spatial probability must be introduced, i.e., annotating which areas are blind spots and the potential risks within those blind spots.

This type of annotation for the "unknown" requires the system to possess strong logical reasoning capabilities, inferring potential conditions behind occlusions through scene context.

Extreme weather conditions like heavy rain, dense fog, or strong backlighting are also nightmares for annotation.

In these situations, the images captured by visual sensors are filled with noise and have extremely low contrast, rendering traditional feature point matching algorithms almost entirely ineffective.

To solve this problem, annotation systems must shift toward a multimodal fusion approach. 4D millimeter-wave radar plays a crucial role here, as it can penetrate dense fog and directly measure objects' distance and speed.

The annotation system must deeply bind the radar's physical measurements with the semantic information from visual images.

The challenge in this cross-modal annotation is that radar data is very sparse and filled with false reflection points. The annotation system must possess a filtering capability to remove false targets generated by reflections off roadside barriers while retaining weak signals representing real risks.

Long-tail scenarios—rare but high-consequence extreme cases—also represent a deep-water zone for annotation work.

These scenarios might include various strange objects fallen on the road, abnormally behaving traffic participants, or extremely complex construction zones.

Since these scenarios occur with very low probability in raw data, the annotation system must first possess an "anomaly mining" capability.

The system uses large models to scan massive mileage, identifying segments where the model is uncertain, has extremely low confidence, or exhibits abnormal vehicle takeover rates, then focuses efforts on high-difficulty precise (precision) annotation.

This targeted annotation no longer pursues quantity but rather the "information density" of data—i.e., each frame of data teaches the model a new skill for handling extreme situations.

Another direction for addressing long-tail scenarios is combining simulation data. When real-world data is insufficient, using high-quality synthetic data to supplement the annotation set has become a trend.

However, the challenge lies in narrowing the gap between the simulated and real worlds.

If the simulated annotation data is overly "idealized," the trained model may produce severe hallucinations or misjudgments when faced with the complex lighting and dust of the real world.

Therefore, annotation in the large model era must not only process real images but also evaluate and calibrate the realism of simulated data, ensuring that the experience learned by machines in virtual worlds can perfectly transfer to real roads.

Transition to Logical Annotation for End-to-End Decision-Making

With the popularization of end-to-end technology, autonomous driving is transitioning from a segmented "perception-decision-execution" architecture to an integrated architecture that directly generates trajectories from sensor inputs.

This technological evolution requires annotating not just "what the world looks like" but also "why it should be driven this way."

In previous architectures, the endpoint of annotation was perception results; but in end-to-end architectures, the core of annotation becomes human driving intelligence.

This requires precise (precision) capture of human drivers' trajectories, operations, and decision-making logic in complex interactive environments.

A core challenge in end-to-end annotation is handling the diversity of driving behaviors.

At the same intersection, different human drivers may make different choices. Some are aggressive, others cautious. If all driving data is simply fed to the model, the model may exhibit abnormal behavior due to learning contradictory logic.

Therefore, annotation systems now need to add a behavioral intention label. The system must mark whether the current driving action is for avoidance, lane changing, or overtaking, and evaluate the quality of the action.

This type of annotation, infused with subjective evaluation, transforms data from mere cold coordinates into sequences of logical decisions.

To enhance end-to-end model performance, some techniques attempt to introduce large language model capabilities into the annotation process. By converting visual scenes into language descriptions, large models can automatically generate textual explanations for each driving scenario.

For example, "Because the vehicle ahead on the left has activated its brake lights and there is space to change lanes on the right, the driver chose to brake slightly and shift right." This type of semantically explained annotation helps vehicle-mounted models better understand the causal relationships behind driving, rather than just imitating trajectory curves.

The challenge in this type of annotation lies in ensuring complete alignment between language descriptions and the pixels and coordinates of the physical world.

This is an extremely complex cross-modal learning process that requires establishing deep connections between vision, space, time, and language.

End-to-end annotation also faces the challenge of missing "negative samples."

In most road test data, we only see successful driving behaviors. However, to teach the model risk avoidance, we also need to show it what constitutes erroneous behavior.

Since we cannot create accidents on real roads, this requires generating large amounts of "critical scenario" annotations through data augmentation or generative AI.

For example, modifying a normal driving trajectory algorithmically into a potential collision trajectory and labeling it as a "non-feasible region."

This type of annotation targeting safety boundaries is the safety foundation for end-to-end autonomous driving to ultimately hit the roads. In this process, annotation has transcended depicting reality and become an exploration and definition of infinite possibilities.

Final Words

Autonomous driving annotation in the era of large models is no longer a simple labor input but has evolved into a cutting-edge technological field integrating high-definition maps, 3D reconstruction, spatiotemporal perception, and cognitive reasoning. While this increase in complexity brings significant cost and technical pressure, it also provides the possibility for autonomous driving to overcome the final 1% of long-tail challenges.

-- END --